Grant Matching
Civly Nonprofits

Find the funders already paying for work like yours.

Civly matches your programs against millions of paid grants in public IRS filings. Each match includes the funder’s giving history, whether it accepts applications, its restrictions, and the deadline where available.

Start with the grants a funder has paid.

IRS filings list grant recipients, amounts, and purposes. Private foundations also report whether they accept applications and any restrictions or deadlines. Civly uses these records to identify funders that fit your work.

You can see that application block for yourself, free. Our Open Foundations explorer publishes, state by state, the 8,971 private foundations that tell the IRS they accept unsolicited requests, with the deadline, the restrictions and the contact exactly as filed. Only 27,218 of the 131,545 foundations that answer the question say yes, and the explorer is the list. Grant Matching is what happens next: your programs matched against the grants those funders actually paid.

What they fund, in their words

Every grant carries a purpose line the funder wrote — “community health worker training,” “emergency shelter operations,” “after-school literacy.” We match your programs against that text across millions of paid grants, not against a category dropdown that flattens your work into “Human Services.”

Who they actually fund

Recipient name, address, and EIN sit on the grant record. So we can see what a funder does rather than what it claims: whether it gives outside its own county, whether it writes $10,000 checks or $500,000 checks, and whether the organizations it backs look anything like yours.

Whether you can apply, and by when

A private foundation states on its own return whether it takes unsolicited requests, what it limits awards to by geography and field, who to address them to, and the deadline. Where a funder publishes guidelines instead, we read those. So a foundation that only pays a preselected circle is marked closed before you spend a week on it, and an open one arrives with its restrictions and its cutoff attached. Federal notices run alongside on a live feed, sorted by what closes first.

What a match looks like

Every row carries the evidence that produced it: the grant, the year, the purpose the funder gave it, the filing it came from — and whether they will take a request from you, restricted to what, closing when.

Civly Grant MatchRiverside Community Health Alliance Illustrative example
01
Cedar Ridge Family FoundationPrivate foundation · Columbus, OH
$1.24M9 peer organizations · 2019–2024
Paid for training and salary support for community health workers serving uninsured adults — $180,000 to a peer organization, FY2024990-PF Part XV, line 3
Decision-makers on the filing: 4 trustees, two of whom also sit on an Ohio hospital board
Accepts requestsLetter of inquiry first, 1 March. Limited to central Ohio, health and human services990-PF Part XV, line 2
02
Weatherfield FoundationPrivate foundation · Chicago, IL · gives in 11 states
$2.10M14 peer organizations · 2020–2024
Paid for primary care access for uninsured adults — $250,000, FY2024. Three of its grantees are your size and outside Illinois990-PF Part XV, line 3
Decision-makers on the filing: 7 officers and directors
Accepts requestsRolling, board reviews quarterly. No stated geographic limit990-PF Part XV, line 2
03
Millbrook Community FoundationPublic charity · Columbus, OH
$860K6 peer organizations · 2021–2024
Paid for mobile clinic operations in medically underserved census tracts — $125,000, FY2023, and again in FY2024990 Schedule I
Decision-makers on the filing: 11 officers, directors and key employees
Accepts requestsTwo cycles, 15 February and 15 August. Must serve the countyFunder’s published guidelines
04
The Halloran TrustPrivate foundation · Cincinnati, OH
$540K5 peer organizations · 2019–2023
Paid for health navigation for immigrant and refugee families — $75,000, FY2023. Adjacent, not identical990-PF Part XV, line 3
Decision-makers on the filing: 3 trustees
Preselected onlyTicks the box for no unsolicited requests. Ranked last for that reason, and shown so you can stop wondering990-PF Part XV, line 2
Every organization, figure, purpose and deadline on this sheet is invented to show the format — none of these funders exists. In a live match each one resolves to a filing or a published page you can open yourself.

How the Match Works

Three passes: read your organization out of its own filings, find the funders whose money moves toward that work and will take a request from you, then name the people who decide.

Read your organization

  1. Anchor on your EIN — your own returns carry your purpose, your program descriptions, your revenue and your geography. No questionnaire to fill in first.
  2. Use your program language, not a category — the plain-English description of what you actually do is a far better matching key than an NTEE code shared by 40,000 organizations.
  3. Treat your current funders as the strongest signal — who already gives to you describes who else might, better than anything you could write about yourself.
  4. Set the ask band — grants near a size you can absorb and report on, so the list is not topped by a $5M outlier you will never win.

Find the funders

  1. Search purpose text across millions of paid grants — by meaning rather than keyword, so “community health worker” still finds a funder who wrote “lay health navigator.”
  2. Screen for reachability — does this funder give beyond its home city, beyond its founding family, at your size, to organizations it had no prior tie to?
  3. Check the application gate — a private foundation declares on its return whether it takes unsolicited requests, and what it limits awards to by geography, field and kind of institution. One that funds only a preselected circle ranks last however well its grants match.
  4. Attach the deadline — the submission deadline off the same filing, or the current cycle off the funder’s own published guidelines where there is no filed one.
  5. Rank on recency and repetition — a funder that gave three years running is a live prospect. One that gave once, in 2016, is a history lesson.
  6. Remove what you already have — your existing funders come out, so the list is only new ground.

Name the people

  1. Pull officers and directors from the same filings — the trustees and staff who actually approve grants, with their titles.
  2. Take the contact off the filing — a foundation that accepts requests has to name the person to address them to, with a phone number or an email. That comes off the return rather than out of a guess.
  3. Find the overlap — board members you share, or who serve alongside someone already on your board. A warm path beats a cold letter.
  4. Attach the evidence — every name arrives with the grant that put the funder on your list in the first place.

Grant matches in your inbox.

As new filings arrive, Civly sends a brief with new matches, changes at funders you are tracking, and contacts to approach. Reply to request more detail on any funder.

Grant Match — 4 new funders, 1 change Civly <briefs@civly.ai> · to Development, Riverside Community Health Alliance

Four funders newly match your programs, and one you were already tracking changed its giving. Two close inside the next eight weeks.

  • Cedar Ridge Family Foundation — $180,000 for community health worker salaries, FY2024. First time this fund has appeared in your match. Letter of inquiry by 1 March · 4 trustees named · filing attached
  • Weatherfield Foundation — gave outside Illinois in three of the last four years. Rolling, next board review in six weeks · 7 officers named · filing attached
  • The Halloran Trust — adjacent purpose language, smaller checks. Preselected only, so ranked last and listed for completeness. 3 trustees named
  • Millbrook Community Foundation — repeat grant to a peer, FY2023 and FY2024. Closes 15 February, must serve the county · 11 officers named

Changed: a funder on your list has not reported a grant in your program area for two consecutive filings. Worth a call before another proposal cycle.

What the Match Runs On

Public filings first, at scale, and the funder’s own published guidelines where the filing runs out.

Foundation giving

  1. Private-foundation grants (990-PF, Part XV, line 3) — millions of grants: recipient name, address and EIN, the amount, the purpose in the foundation’s words, and any stated relationship between grantee and foundation manager.
  2. Charity-to-charity grants (990, Schedule I) — what community foundations, United Ways, hospital systems and large charities pay out to other organizations.
  3. Foundation contributors (990-PF, Schedule B) — the named donors funding a private foundation, which is often how you learn who is really behind it.

Whether they will hear from you

  1. The application block (990-PF, Part XV, line 2) — a private foundation that takes unsolicited requests must file who to address them to, the form they should take, the submission deadline, and any restriction by geography, charitable field or kind of institution. One that does not take them ticks a box saying so.
  2. Published funder guidelines — public charities filing Schedule I have no equivalent block, so for community foundations, United Ways and hospital systems we read the eligibility and deadline pages they publish themselves.
  3. Open federal notices — a live feed of federal opportunities running alongside the filings: 1,690 notices, 537 of them open to a 501(c)(3), 97% carrying a hard closing date. And where a peer’s money came from a federal program, the program itself and its eligibility rules, rather than only the award that landed.

The people, and your own record

  1. Officers, directors and trustees (990, Part VII) — who runs the funder, their title, and how long they have been there, across tens of millions of filed rows.
  2. Key-employee compensation (Schedule J) — useful for reading how professionalized a funder is, and whether there is program staff to talk to at all.
  3. Federal and state awards — federal award records and the SAM.gov registry, plus contracts and grants in California, New York and Texas, so you can see which peers hold public money and for what.
  4. Your filings — your purpose, programs, revenue, geography and existing funders, read straight out of your returns.

Where the record stops. The live feed covers federal notices. It is not a calendar of every open call in the country: foundation deadlines still arrive attached to the funders your match surfaces, because most are never posted anywhere — of 101,914 private foundations, 1,569 state a deadline at all. A 990 also describes a year that has already closed, so a deadline filed on last year’s return is that year’s cycle; where the cycle matters we check it against what the funder publishes now. Some foundations file “none” against the deadline question even when they run one.

What the record buys you is direction a directory cannot give: which funders actually move money toward work like yours, at what size, how often, whether they will read a request from you at all, and which human being to send it to. Every claim on your match sheet resolves to a filing or a published page you can open and read yourself.

Works with the rest of Civly

Grant Matching finds the money. These decide what you do about it.

Donor Due Diligence →

A match tells you a funder is reachable. It does not tell you whether the gift is safe to accept. Run the funder, its principals, or a prospective board member before the money is on your books.

Deep Research →

When a funder matters enough to prepare for properly — its giving history, its leadership, its other grantees, and what has been written about it — in one sourced report.

AI Operator →

The standing job behind the brief. Re-run the match on a schedule, watch named funders for new filings, and put the result in an inbox instead of a dashboard.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is this different from a grant database subscription? +
Civly matches your programs to grants funders have paid, then checks eligibility and deadlines. Matches account for grant size, geography, and whether a funder gives to organizations outside its existing network.
Where does the data come from? +
Public IRS filings, parsed from the raw electronic returns rather than scraped from a third-party summary. Private-foundation grants come from 990-PF Part XV, charity-to-charity grants from 990 Schedule I, and officers and directors from 990 Part VII and Schedule J. Federal award records and the SAM.gov grantee registry sit alongside them.
Most foundations say they do not accept unsolicited proposals. Does that make this useless? +
It makes the filings more useful, not less. A foundation that only funds a preselected circle shows it: the same recipients year after year, and a filing that names the relationship between a grantee and a foundation manager. Those rank last. What surfaces instead are funders with a demonstrated pattern of backing organizations they were not already connected to, and named trustees who can be approached properly rather than through a form.
How current is the data? +
The IRS publishes electronic returns monthly, and we take them from that release rather than waiting for an aggregator to parse them. That said, a return covers a fiscal year that has already ended, so the newest filings describe last year's giving. Giving patterns move slowly, which is what makes them worth matching on. Deadlines do not, so where a cycle date matters we check the filed one against what the funder publishes today rather than sending you at a date that has moved.
Do you tell me the deadline and whether we are eligible? +
Yes, and it comes off the same filing as the grants. A private foundation that accepts unsolicited requests has to state on its 990-PF who applications go to, what form they should take, the submission deadline, and any limits by geography, charitable field or kind of institution. One that does not accept them ticks a box saying so, which is often the single most useful line on the sheet: it tells you which foundations are a waste of your week before you write anything. Public charities filing Schedule I have no equivalent block, so for community foundations, United Ways and hospital systems we read the eligibility and deadline pages they publish themselves.
Do you write or submit the application? +
Yes, through AI Operator. An operator drafts the proposal using the funder’s giving record, and a human analyst reviews it. You handle submission and the funder relationship.
Is this only for 501(c)(3) nonprofits? +
It is built for them, but the same match runs for anyone whose funding comes from grantmakers: university and hospital foundations, museums and arts organizations, community development corporations, and advocacy organizations on the 501(c)(3) side of the house. If your money comes from foundations rather than customers, the filings work the same way.

See who is already funding work like yours

Send us your EIN. We will run the match and walk you through the funders it surfaces, the evidence behind each one, and the people worth approaching first.

Get a Grant Match